Integrating Tech Means More than Ticking Tech Boxes

ICT, IT, technology integration, 21st century learning… the list goes on. Whatever your position within a school, however “forward-thinking” you or your organization may be, there are a lot of terms out there and the list continues to grow.

Take a deep breath.

I am going to ask for a leap of faith here.

We are going to drop our egos, admit we don’t know everything, yes, even you who think you do! In order to move forward with the undertaking of meeting technology standards in an integrated model, or anything, things work better if we all take the Socratic stance of, “…all I know is that I know nothing.”

We all have more to learn and by adopting this stance we can move forward together as learners, encouraging those of us who need to feel a little courageous moving into the unknown.

It is instructive, since we are educators and familiar with terms specific to teaching and learning, to proceed as though we were devising a unit of study for a class. I will try to remain brief. This is an overview not a manual or a treatise after all. The implementation of any such venture, however, will take years to develop and will never be done. Ask one of those who thinks they know everything what the next three important technologies will be. Then enjoy the silence.

Now, let’s begin.

Checking for Prior Knowledge/Mapping Pathways
Where are we at, right now, as a school?

  1. Define strengths and areas in need of further development
  2. Map a strategy for continual professional development
  3. Get everyone on the same page by starting with the basics. Do not rush into planning committees before everyone knows what the goal looks like. Invite stakeholders with more knowledge to be part of the process as presenters.

FOCUS QUESTION: Why integrate technology across the curriculum?

Tuning In
Once we have established why we should integrate, let’s take a look at how. Workshop time. Integration and planning focused staff learning opportunities. Everyone gets wet! Identify key areas of focus and invite staff to sign up for a range of workshops with the proviso that they come back, not as experts, but learners ready to share with the rest of their burgeoning Professional Learning Community.

Finding Out
Get busy applying in the classroom. Brainstorm in your teams where YOU think integration fits naturally to increase learning outcomes across the curriculum. Celebrate your successes, share your failures. An open, accepting forum will help to ensure everyone gets on board. Celebrate your failures. It will make you, your team, your school and your program stronger if you embrace attempting new things.
http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/04/google-wave-eric-schmidt/


Going Further/Taking Action (Though you never really stopped)

Ok, it is time. You’ve done your due diligence now you are ready to tackle tech through an integrated, articulated, vertical curriculum. There are a variety of great resources out there to get you started and keep you efficiently beavering away for years in the right direction:

You can find an overview of how these resources can be used in concert here. I would also encourage you to keep in mind this definition cut and pasted here for your reference from The George Lucas Education Foundation’s Edutopia blog.

Effective tech integration must happen across the curriculum in ways that research shows deepen and enhance the learning process. In particular, it must support four key components of learning:

  • active engagement
  • participation in groups
  • frequent interaction and feedback
  • connection to real-world experts.

Effective technology integration is achieved when the use of technology is routine and transparent and when technology supports curricular goals.

It is also important to bear in mind that a wide range of scholars have argued that knowledge about technology cannot be treated as context-free, and that good teaching requires an understanding of how technology relates to the pedagogy and content.
http://mkoehler.educ.msu.edu/tpack/what-is-tpack/

Some Key Terms & Definitions in this Context

Integrated: The use of technology is embedded in the curriculum. Students learn how to use it as part of study in order to improve learning outcomes.

Articulated: It is clearly defined as to the wheres and whens in order to avoid letting the development of necessary skills to slip through the cracks. I would add a note here that any program of integration must be reviewed in an ongoing fashion and that where inspiration strikes teachers should never be told not to use a technology they feel strongly will enhance student learning because it is meant to be covered later. Documentation exists to serve student learning and not the other way around.

Vertical: The learning of technology in the classroom is considered throughout the years of schooling. Skills and technology that have been identified as necessary are covered at increasing levels of complexity, building on previous learning and skill development.

Victorian Education Learning Standards (ICT): An Excellent Example
Go to this site for fantastic exemplars.

Reflecting
As within our classrooms, this is a fundamental and ongoing part of the process. It should be continual at an individual level and shared for assessing current outcomes and revising plans for future movement at regularly scheduled meetings.

Some Parting Thoughts
Ok, now that’s all done.

Did I mention the part about student learning being best advanced through self-directed inquiry meaning your finely tuned plans are really just a wonderful skeleton around which student choice may turn them into mere phantoms?

Well, not exactly, having spent the time and effort to get this far, you are in a much more informed position from which to guide students through project or challenge based learning strategies should your school wish to go down those roads. Check out (again on Edutopia) Project-Based Learning Professional Development Guide.

Remember, the longer the road ahead of you, the more you need to keep looking backwards at all the ground you have already covered to keep up your momentum.

Your students are worth the effort.

About these ads

About Sean Thompson

Sean has accepted a position as the Director of Technology at The Early Learning Centre, City School, in Bangkok. He is excited to be working with Giovanni Piazza and the rest of the staff to raise awareness of digital-age teaching and learning practice in this Reggio Emilia inspired environment. Sean is also an Apple Distinguished Educator, an International Baccalaureate Educator Network Workshop Leader and a Google Educator available for professional development at your school.
This entry was posted in Digital Learning, Literacy, New Media and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Integrating Tech Means More than Ticking Tech Boxes

  1. Wow, great post! Very definitive. As my school looks to go from a stand alone class system to an integrated, coach style system next year, I’m sure this article will come in handy. I will be sure to send it to my replacement.

  2. Sean says:

    You flatter me sir!
    Has a Mister Norris heir been determined then?
    See you in Yokohama tomorrow. The final night!

  3. I think there has been a replacement appointed but I’m not sure if it’s official or not. Will chat with you tomorrow about it.

  4. Pingback: The (T)Ec(H)centricity of Me | Travis Ion – Read Review Reflect

  5. This is something you could go to admin with and say this is what we need to happen to make our school a 21st Century learning environment. And I think it is so fantastic that you recognize that even after all the planning, the learning may go in an entirely different directions. (The line “student learning being best advanced through self-directed inquiry meaning your finely tuned plans are really just a wonderful skeleton around which student choice may turn them into mere phantom” was incredible image!). And the fact is, as you state, our kids are worth all this energy and hard-work, and flexibility. Thanks!

  6. The first piece of advice my mother gave me about teaching: Always know the reason you are doing what you are doing.

    I spent High School learning how to program in BASIC and learning RAM vs. ROM via textbooks. The programming helped with my logic – but all other “tools” learning is now irrelevant.

    In my 1:1 environment, my questions are twofold:
    1. How could technology help students understand concepts?
    2. How could technology help students better communicate their understanding or their message?

    Look at the myriad of possibilities and teach students to make effective choices in both the reception and production of information. The tools will change. At some point, the students will need to choose between a myriad of tools without our guidance.

    I wish my teachers had spent less time teaching me Appleworks 1987 version.

    • Sean says:

      Hello Janet,

      Thanks for sharing your thoughts. You can consider your two questions “appropriated”. I’ve checked out your blog and started following you. Some great ideas there.

      Thanks again,
      Sean

  7. Hi Sean – I hope this finds you well and enjoying new challenges. I love the scaffold you build here . I find I kept coming back (as you do, too) in the fundamentals of keeping the integration authentic. The short video you included above was successful because the technology helped the students answer meaningful questions to achieve results they were palpably interested in. You said it well with, “being best advanced through self-directed inquiry”. A question this raises in me, is whether or not it is high time to stop contriving learning experiences and simply put students in touch with a variety of meaningful work. Perhaps different than the model of school as the practice field that we have today, I can see this leading to something along the lines of the real deal with training wheels. As teachers we’d be there to share and take advantage useful theory and tools (technology or otherwise) to help get real jobs done. As we get ready to launch into course 5 it is inspiring and necessary for me to re-engage with what we were doing. Thanks for providing such as thought provoking opportunity for me to do just that. – AC

    • Sean says:

      Hey thanks for sharing your thoughts Adam. Funny you should comment today, I saw your picture on the YIS site. I’ve started researching for the site I’ve been asked to produce for DISK.

      I am now teaching MYP and, yes, conjuring authenticity has already proved challenging in this new framework.

      I’ll miss the COETAIL banter Saturday. Too far a commute! Glad to still be in touch. Say hi to the cohorts for me.

  8. Lissa Layman says:

    This is a great resource Sean! I only wish someone had been able to help our school develop our technology/1:1 program in this way. Thank you for sharing!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s